<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Outlook Needs Industrial Engineering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.2time-sys.com/2009/04/08/why-outlook-needs-industrial-engineering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.2time-sys.com/2009/04/08/why-outlook-needs-industrial-engineering/</link>
	<description>The World&#039;s Best Resource for Time Management 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:44:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://www.2time-sys.com/2009/04/08/why-outlook-needs-industrial-engineering/#comment-6507</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2time-sys.com/2009/04/08/why-outlook-needs-industrial-engineering/#comment-6507</guid>
		<description>Hi. You have quite a nice and extensive blog on time management. As for outlook, I don&#039;t think more touch of industrial engineering would not save it from its defects. It&#039;s simply not made for effective time management. Personally, I think Time &amp; Chaos is much better choice for personal time and task management.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. You have quite a nice and extensive blog on time management. As for outlook, I don&#8217;t think more touch of industrial engineering would not save it from its defects. It&#8217;s simply not made for effective time management. Personally, I think Time &amp; Chaos is much better choice for personal time and task management.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

