Practicing New Habits

ropes-course.JPGI recently got a little too happy when I found a game on CNet.com that claimed to be a “time management game.”

The reason for my premature celebration is that I have been trying to find a way to help participants in my 2-day and online programs to practice the 11 fundamentals in some way.  I initially imagined that this could be done through a simulation, in which I created an imaginary environment to manage a large number of time demands.

The game, which I played for an hour, was all about running a pet fish store, and required the owner to make split-second decisions about what fish to stock, what fish-food to use and what ornaments to place in the tank.  As the game progressed, things moved faster and faster, and at different levels, points could be accumulated  that could be exchanged for a bigger tank and better machines, among other upgrades.

As time went  on, I was indeed getting better at playing the game, and at making split-second decisions about how to manage my time in the game.

The only  problem is, the game lasted only 60 minutes, and I don’t plan to ever play it again.

So, my new-found skills are essentially useless  now that the game is over, as all I really learned to do was to play the game better.

It reminded me of a day I spent on a ropes course  with a team of which I was a member.  We performed all sorts of interesting tasks that required communication, teamwork, planning, etc.

However, it made not a shred of difference to the members of the team, once we returned to the office.

I suppose that with constant  practice that we could have become better at navigating ropes courses.  I also imagine that with more time I could have become a better player of the “pet-fish store game.”

However,  I would not have become a better team player, or have improved any time management skills by continuing in either direction.

This makes sense — I doubt that Michael Jordan spends too much time improving his basketball game by playing NBA Live on his Nintendo.  Also, I doubt that the kid who won the last   World of Warcraft contest would do too well fighting the insurgents in Afghanistan.

In the 2Time system, the core habits that I identified were only those that could be observed, and they all include some element of physical motion.  Mental habits  like ” focusing” or “prioritizing” were deliberately left out of the fundamentals.

I now see that playing a video game involves very different physical motion and practices than playing basketball.  Someone watching a game player from behind would not mistake them for a basketball player due to how differently they are using their bodies.

Someone watching a  team going through a session at the ropes course would not be mistake them for a team that is huddled over the sales results from last month trying to decide which strategy to follow.

Finally, playing a video game does not, alas, make me a better manager of my time, unless it causes me to engage in one or more of the 11 fundamentals  in some way.

I think that true practice comes from repeating actions until they become ingrained into our neuro-muscular systems, and if that’s not happening, then it’s not really practice.

So, I am back to where I started, still looking for a way to help users to practice the 11 fundamentals in a safe environment.

Click here to be taken to Jenny’s Fish-Shop – Time Management Game.

Related Articles:

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

Bookmark and Share

For Download Now

Grab a copy of our Special Report

Click here to find out how to get your copy
Powered by CTA Plugin

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post  [Post to Digg] Digg This Post  [Post to StumbleUpon] Stumble This Post 

This entry was posted in Habits, learning, Practice and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Practicing New Habits

  1. Beth says:

    Interesting post however, I strongly disagree with you assessment of the value of an “experience” or “activity” once you return to the office. The ability of the facilitator to help participants transfer that learning is a key component of “experiential” or “adventure” education. Take a look at some of David Kolb’s work on the Experiential Learning Cycle ( http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-explrn.htm ) or any other number of websites.

    My assessment, from over 10 years in this field of the use of an activity, ropes course or a problem sovling activity, is that the inability to integrate into the work enviornment and for it to have a long-term lasting impact, is an indication that the “facilitator” does not have solid background and experience.

    I do agree with you that a simple recreational activity (a self-belayed climbing wall or a white water rafting trip) without any facilitation, can be a great fun, team building, morale boosting day…but without appropriate front loading, processing, debriefing and follow up…does not have a lasting impact.

    Beth Wonson, Project Adventure Inc.

  2. fwade_admin says:

    I guess my question is, why not teach the skills in the middle of a typical meeting rather than on the ropes?

    In other words, why not base the intervention in the office in a real situation rather than someplace else?

    I have observed that real problems can be used as fodder for the fire, which leads me to think that the outdoors simulation can be replaced by one that is closer to home, or even real.

    IMHO.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>