<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Replying to Every Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/01/replying-to-every-email/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/01/replying-to-every-email/</link>
	<description>Edgy Ideas for Upgrading Your Life Using Time Management 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:37:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mooneroid</title>
		<link>http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/01/replying-to-every-email/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>mooneroid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/01/replying-to-every-email/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>What is this habit supposed to do for you?  I&#039;ve heard this suggestion before as well, but haven&#039;t been able to figure out how it would benefit someone.  When you say you&#039;ve been trying it and it seems to &quot;work&quot;, what does that mean?  I&#039;m not trying to be negative.  The suggestion sounds like something useful, I&#039;m just trying to determine what the use actually is.  It seems to me that if you already have a trusted and reliable system in place to process what comes into your inbox, this would be an additional processing method to add to your system, and it&#039;s not really necessary.  So does &quot;working&quot; then mean that this system is easier to maintain than the one you have established already?  

I&#039;m just interested in your thoughts.  Is it worth a change to your existing methods?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this habit supposed to do for you?  I&#8217;ve heard this suggestion before as well, but haven&#8217;t been able to figure out how it would benefit someone.  When you say you&#8217;ve been trying it and it seems to &#8220;work&#8221;, what does that mean?  I&#8217;m not trying to be negative.  The suggestion sounds like something useful, I&#8217;m just trying to determine what the use actually is.  It seems to me that if you already have a trusted and reliable system in place to process what comes into your inbox, this would be an additional processing method to add to your system, and it&#8217;s not really necessary.  So does &#8220;working&#8221; then mean that this system is easier to maintain than the one you have established already?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just interested in your thoughts.  Is it worth a change to your existing methods?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gini Nelson&#8217;s Engaging Conflicts &#187; &#8220;The New Time Management: Simply Focus on the Fundamentals, and Toss Away the Tips&#8221; &#8212; EngagingConflicts.com</title>
		<link>http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/01/replying-to-every-email/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Gini Nelson&#8217;s Engaging Conflicts &#187; &#8220;The New Time Management: Simply Focus on the Fundamentals, and Toss Away the Tips&#8221; &#8212; EngagingConflicts.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/01/replying-to-every-email/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>[...] suggestion, from his blog, on emptying an email inbox: It’s very simple - for every important piece of email, send a reply, even a short one, to say [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] suggestion, from his blog, on emptying an email inbox: It’s very simple &#8211; for every important piece of email, send a reply, even a short one, to say [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
