<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Replying to Every Email</title>
	<link>http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/01/replying-to-every-email/</link>
	<description>Tools for Designing Your Own Time Management System</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mooneroid</title>
		<link>http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/01/replying-to-every-email/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>mooneroid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/01/replying-to-every-email/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>What is this habit supposed to do for you?  I've heard this suggestion before as well, but haven't been able to figure out how it would benefit someone.  When you say you've been trying it and it seems to "work", what does that mean?  I'm not trying to be negative.  The suggestion sounds like something useful, I'm just trying to determine what the use actually is.  It seems to me that if you already have a trusted and reliable system in place to process what comes into your inbox, this would be an additional processing method to add to your system, and it's not really necessary.  So does "working" then mean that this system is easier to maintain than the one you have established already?  

I'm just interested in your thoughts.  Is it worth a change to your existing methods?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this habit supposed to do for you?  I&#8217;ve heard this suggestion before as well, but haven&#8217;t been able to figure out how it would benefit someone.  When you say you&#8217;ve been trying it and it seems to &#8220;work&#8221;, what does that mean?  I&#8217;m not trying to be negative.  The suggestion sounds like something useful, I&#8217;m just trying to determine what the use actually is.  It seems to me that if you already have a trusted and reliable system in place to process what comes into your inbox, this would be an additional processing method to add to your system, and it&#8217;s not really necessary.  So does &#8220;working&#8221; then mean that this system is easier to maintain than the one you have established already?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m just interested in your thoughts.  Is it worth a change to your existing methods?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gini Nelson&#8217;s Engaging Conflicts &#187; &#8220;The New Time Management: Simply Focus on the Fundamentals, and Toss Away the Tips&#8221; &#8212; EngagingConflicts.com</title>
		<link>http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/01/replying-to-every-email/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Gini Nelson&#8217;s Engaging Conflicts &#187; &#8220;The New Time Management: Simply Focus on the Fundamentals, and Toss Away the Tips&#8221; &#8212; EngagingConflicts.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.2time-sys.com/2008/04/01/replying-to-every-email/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>[...] suggestion, from his blog, on emptying an email inbox: It’s very simple - for every important piece of email, send a reply, even a short one, to say [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] suggestion, from his blog, on emptying an email inbox: It’s very simple - for every important piece of email, send a reply, even a short one, to say [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
